Literature & Books 600 words

The Most Hated Character in the Great Gatsby

Sample Essay

While Jay Gatsby's relentless pursuit of Daisy Buchanan often draws the ire of critics and readers alike, it is Tom Buchanan who truly embodies the moral bankruptcy and destructive arrogance at the heart of F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby. Gatsby, despite his questionable methods and illusionary dream, is driven by a romantic, albeit misguided, ideal. Tom, conversely, is a brute force of inherited privilege, blind to his own moral failings and utterly unremorseful for the havoc he wreaks. His racism, sexism, and casual cruelty reveal him as the novel's true antagonist, a symbol of the decaying American Dream and the callousness of the established elite.

Tom's overt racism, explicitly displayed in his pronouncements on the "rise of the colored empires," is not merely a product of his time but a defining characteristic that exposes his shallow intellect and deeply ingrained prejudice. He latches onto pseudoscientific theories like those presented in The Rise of the Coloured Empires by Lothrop Stoddard, using them to justify his sense of superiority and fear of social change. This isn't a passing remark; it's a fundamental belief system that colors his perception of the world and everyone in it, particularly those outside his privileged social circle. His pronouncements create a palpable tension in the Plaza Hotel scene, alienating and offending not only Gatsby but also Nick Carraway, the novel's narrator, who is forced to witness this ugly display of bigotry.

Furthermore, Tom's treatment of women is nothing short of deplorable, showcasing a profound misogyny masked by superficial charm. His affair with Myrtle Wilson is conducted with a blatant disregard for her husband's feelings and a possessive cruelty that culminates in his violent assault on her. When Myrtle defies him, he responds not with reasoned discussion but with a swift, brutal blow that breaks her nose, a stark illustration of his belief in physical dominance. His subsequent manipulation of Myrtle's desire to escape her life with George Wilson by revealing Gatsby's affair with Daisy demonstrates a Machiavellian cunning born of pure self-interest and a desire to protect his own social standing, even at the cost of another's life. He uses Daisy as a possession to be reclaimed, her emotional turmoil of no consequence compared to his wounded pride.

Gatsby's idealism, however flawed, stands in stark contrast to Tom's pragmatic, self-serving materialism. Gatsby dedicates his entire existence to recreating a past moment with Daisy, a grand, if ultimately unattainable, aspiration. He builds a kingdom, throws lavish parties, and cultivates an aura of mystery all in pursuit of this singular vision. While this obsession leads to his downfall, it possesses a certain tragic grandeur. Tom, on the other hand, is content with his existing power and privilege. He has no grand dreams; his sole ambition seems to be maintaining the status quo and indulging his basest desires. His "friendship" with Gatsby is a façade; he despises Gatsby's new money and his presumption of equality, ultimately orchestrating the events that lead to Gatsby's death by falsely implicating him in Myrtle's murder.

Ultimately, Tom Buchanan represents the moral rot that Fitzgerald saw infecting the American elite. His wealth insulates him from consequences, his arrogance blinds him to his own flaws, and his casual cruelty leaves a trail of destruction in his wake. He is the embodiment of the old money elite, clinging to power and tradition with a vicious tenacity, unwilling to acknowledge any worth in those who have risen from less fortunate circumstances. While Gatsby’s pursuit of the American Dream is a romantic tragedy, Tom’s unthinking perpetuation of injustice and suffering makes him the novel’s most truly detestable character.

Analysis

The essay presents a compelling thesis arguing that Tom Buchanan, not Jay Gatsby, is the most detestable character in The Great Gatsby. It structures this argument logically, beginning with an introduction that clearly states the thesis and then dedicating body paragraphs to specific aspects of Tom's character: his racism, his misogyny, and his contrast with Gatsby's idealism. The use of specific examples, such as Tom's reference to The Rise of the Coloured Empires and his assault on Myrtle, provides concrete evidence to support the claims. The tone is critical and analytical, effectively conveying the author's strong negative judgment of Tom's character.

Key Considerations

While the essay strongly argues for Tom's detestability, a potential weakness lies in its portrayal of Gatsby's "idealism." A deeper exploration might acknowledge the inherent selfishness and delusion in Gatsby's singular focus on Daisy, perhaps framing it as a more complex, less purely romantic pursuit. Additionally, while Tom's actions are undeniably reprehensible, the essay could explore whether his behavior stems more from a profound lack of self-awareness and ingrained societal conditioning rather than purely malicious intent, offering a slightly more nuanced, though still critical, perspective.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, focus on maintaining the strong thesis and using specific textual evidence as demonstrated. Avoid vague generalizations about characters; instead, cite their dialogue or actions directly. Ensure your analysis connects these examples back to the main argument. For instance, instead of saying Tom is "mean," explain how his actions—like breaking Myrtle's nose—demonstrate his cruelty. Maintain a consistent critical tone throughout. Don't just summarize plot points; interpret them to prove your point.

Frequently Asked Questions

Tom exhibits overt racism, misogyny, and a profound sense of entitlement. His actions, such as physically assaulting Myrtle Wilson and his callous disregard for others, reveal a deeply selfish and destructive nature.

Tom openly expresses racist views, referencing racist literature like *The Rise of the Coloured Empires* to justify his prejudiced beliefs and express fear of social change.

The essay argues yes, positing that Gatsby's romantic but misguided idealism, however flawed, is less morally bankrupt than Tom's ingrained arrogance, hypocrisy, and casual cruelty.

Tom symbolizes the moral decay and callousness of the wealthy elite in the Jazz Age. His inherited privilege allows him to act without consequence, perpetuating injustice.