Literature & Books 776 words

Symbolism and Communication in Hills Like White Elephants

Sample Essay

Ernest Hemingway's short story "Hills Like White Elephants" is a masterclass in indirect communication, where the characters' unspoken anxieties and diverging desires are as significant as their dialogue. The narrative, set in a Spanish train station on a hot afternoon in 1925, centers on an American man and a young woman named Jig as they discuss a medical procedure—he refers to it as "awfully simple," "an operation." Though never explicitly named, the subtext strongly suggests an abortion. The story's power lies not in direct revelation but in its rich symbolism, particularly the contrasting landscapes and the loaded dialogue that reveals the chasm growing between the couple. Through these elements, Hemingway crafts a poignant portrayal of a relationship at a critical, unspoken juncture.

The most striking symbolic element is the landscape itself, which mirrors the emotional state and conflicting perspectives of Jig and the American. On one side of the station are the "hills that look like white elephants," a fertile, potentially life-giving landscape that Jig finds beautiful and intriguing. She initially sees them as "lovely" and compares them to "fields of grain," suggesting growth, abundance, and a future. However, the American dismisses this view, stating they "don't really look like white elephants" and are just "barren." His perception shifts the image from potential fertility to an unwanted burden, a "white elephant" being something difficult to get rid of. This immediate disagreement over the interpretation of the hills foreshadows their deeper disagreement about the pregnancy. Jig’s initial romanticization of the hills is tied to her nascent hope for the pregnancy, while the American’s pragmatic and dismissive interpretation aligns with his desire to proceed with the abortion and return to their previous, unburdened life.

The other side of the station presents a stark contrast: "a brown and barren desert." This landscape is described as dry, hot, and unforgiving, with no shade. It is where the train will eventually depart for Madrid. This arid environment symbolizes the sterile, emotionless future the American envisions, one devoid of the complications and responsibilities that a child would bring. It is a landscape of finality and emptiness, a future that Jig intuitively rejects. When Jig turns her gaze towards the barren side, it signifies her growing awareness of the bleakness of the path the American is advocating. Her comment that the "world is hot and the country is dry" captures the suffocating and unappealing nature of the life he proposes, a life where her desires and feelings are disregarded. The presence of the beaded curtain separating the bar from the waiting room also acts symbolically. It represents a barrier, a fragile partition between the couple's shared space and the stark realities they are confronting, or perhaps a fragile barrier between their desire for connection and the impending separation.

Beyond the visual symbolism, the dialogue itself is a study in what is not said. The couple’s conversation is characterized by evasion, repetition, and passive aggression. The American repeatedly tries to convince Jig that the "operation" is "perfectly simple" and will make them "happy again," as they were before. He frames it as a choice for their relationship, implying that the pregnancy is an obstacle to their continued happiness and freedom. Jig, however, is not convinced. She understands that such a procedure, regardless of its physical simplicity, carries profound emotional weight and will fundamentally alter their lives and their relationship. Her repeated question, "And you think then we'll be all right and happy?" highlights her deep uncertainty and her fear that the American’s proposed solution will not resolve their underlying issues but rather create new ones. The American's insistence that he doesn't want her to do it "if you don't really want to" is a disingenuous attempt to grant her agency while simultaneously pressuring her with his own desires. This subtle manipulation underscores the power imbalance and the lack of genuine communication.

Ultimately, "Hills Like White Elephants" concludes with an unresolved tension, leaving the reader to ponder the couple's fate. Jig’s final statement, "I'll do it. Because I don't want you to feel any of that way, not ever again," reveals her decision, albeit one made out of a desire to appease the American and preserve what she perceives as their connection, rather than genuine volition. The story does not offer a neat resolution, reflecting the complex and often painful nature of life choices and the difficulty of true understanding between individuals. Hemingway’s masterful use of symbolism and his minimalist approach to dialogue create a story that resonates with the quiet desperation and the profound consequences of decisions made under duress, making it a powerful exploration of communication breakdown and its impact on human relationships.

Analysis

The essay effectively establishes a strong thesis in its introduction, arguing that Hemingway uses symbolism and indirect dialogue to convey the profound tension and unspoken conflict in "Hills Like White Elephants." The structure is logical, dedicating body paragraphs to distinct symbolic elements: the contrasting landscapes and the nature of the dialogue. The analysis of the hills, dividing them into "white elephants" and the barren desert, directly supports the thesis by showing how these images reflect the characters' differing perspectives on the pregnancy. The discussion of the dialogue further strengthens the argument by detailing how evasiveness and passive aggression reveal the communication breakdown. The tone is academic and analytical, maintaining a consistent focus on textual evidence and interpretation without becoming overly subjective.

Key Considerations

While the essay effectively analyzes the central symbolism, it could be strengthened by exploring the subtle nuances of the "white elephant" metaphor more deeply. Is it solely a burden, or does it also carry connotations of something valuable but unwanted, or even sacred and misunderstood? Additionally, the essay might benefit from a more detailed examination of the cultural and historical context of 1920s Spain, and how that might inform the characters' choices and the American's perceived freedom. A discussion on the potential for misinterpretation by the reader, given the story's ambiguity, could also add another layer of critical depth.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, focus on grounding your analysis in specific quotes from the text. Don't just say the landscape is symbolic; show how the descriptions of the hills or the desert relate to the characters' feelings. Avoid summarizing the plot; instead, use plot points as evidence for your interpretive claims. Ensure your thesis is clear and directly answers the prompt. For instance, instead of saying "the symbolism is important," state what the symbolism reveals about communication. Be careful not to overstate your claims; acknowledge where the story leaves room for interpretation.

Frequently Asked Questions

The hills themselves are a primary symbol. Initially described as resembling "white elephants," they represent the pregnancy—an object of potential value but perceived as a burden by the American, while Jig sees a complex beauty in them.

The fertile side of the station, where the hills are, symbolizes potential life and hope, which Jig initially gravitates towards. The barren desert side represents the sterile, unappealing future the American desires, devoid of responsibility.

The characters' indirect, evasive dialogue highlights their inability to communicate honestly. The American pressures Jig, while she grapples with unspoken anxieties, revealing a significant breakdown in their connection.

No, Hemingway deliberately leaves the ending ambiguous. While Jig agrees to the procedure, the emotional consequences and the future of their relationship remain uncertain, reflecting the story's focus on unspoken conflict.