Literature & Books Narrative essay 633 words

How Hawaii Became American a Story of Power Sugar and Identity

Sample Essay

The vibrant, independent Kingdom of Hawaii, a nation forged by King Kamehameha I in 1810, held sway over the Pacific for decades, its sovereignty recognized by major world powers. Yet, by 1898, this kingdom had been absorbed into the United States, a transition driven not by popular will or mutual agreement, but by a potent cocktail of economic ambition, political maneuvering, and a deeply ingrained sense of American exceptionalism. The story of how Hawaii became American is a stark illustration of how economic interests, particularly the lucrative sugar industry, can warp political realities, ultimately leading to the dispossession of indigenous peoples and the forceful imposition of foreign identity.

The seeds of this annexation were sown long before the U.S. flag was officially raised over Iolani Palace. American missionaries had arrived in the 1820s, ostensibly to spread Christianity, but their influence quickly extended into commerce and politics. Their descendants, alongside other American and European businessmen, began to dominate Hawaii's economy, most notably through the cultivation of sugar cane. By the mid-19th century, sugar plantations had become the backbone of Hawaii’s economy, and American planters wielded immense power. This power was amplified by the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875, which granted Hawaiian sugar duty-free access to the American market. This treaty, however, came with a steep price: it granted the U.S. exclusive rights to Pearl Harbor, a strategic naval base that would prove crucial in the later annexation. The economic dependency fostered by this treaty made Hawaii increasingly vulnerable to American influence.

The late 19th century saw a growing desire among these American business interests to solidify their control by formally joining the United States. Queen Liliuokalani, who ascended to the throne in 1891, recognized the precarious position of her kingdom and sought to restore power to the native Hawaiians and strengthen the monarchy’s authority. She drafted a new constitution that would have curbed the influence of foreign businessmen. This move was perceived as a direct threat by the haole (foreign-born white) business elite. In January 1893, a group of these businessmen, with the backing of the U.S. Minister to Hawaii, John L. Stevens, and without the consent of the Hawaiian people or the legitimate government, overthrew Queen Liliuokalani. Stevens ordered American troops ashore, ostensibly to protect American lives and property, effectively facilitating the coup. The Provisional Government, led by Sanford B. Dole, a prominent American businessman, immediately sought annexation by the United States.

President Grover Cleveland, upon learning of the illegitimate nature of the overthrow, initially refused to annex Hawaii, condemning the actions of the U.S. minister and calling for the restoration of the Queen. However, his successor, William McKinley, with the strategic imperative of the Spanish-American War looming and a growing belief in America's manifest destiny to expand its influence, saw Hawaii as a vital coaling station and naval base. In 1898, amidst the war and with little regard for the pleas of the Hawaiian people, the U.S. Congress passed the Newlands Resolution, annexing the Republic of Hawaii. A formal transfer ceremony took place on August 12, 1898, marking the end of Hawaiian sovereignty and the beginning of its status as an American territory.

The annexation was not a simple geopolitical event; it was a profound assault on Hawaiian identity. The native Hawaiian population, which had already been decimated by disease and displacement, found their culture, language, and political autonomy systematically suppressed under American rule. While the U.S. government framed the annexation as a benevolent act of civilization and progress, the reality for Hawaiians was one of dispossession and assimilation. The dream of a sovereign, culturally distinct Hawaii was replaced by the imposed identity of an American territory, and later, a state. The legacy of this power play continues to resonate, prompting ongoing discussions about historical injustices and the enduring strength of Hawaiian identity.

Analysis

This narrative essay effectively traces Hawaii's annexation by the U.S., presenting a clear thesis: economic interests, specifically the sugar trade, coupled with political ambition and a sense of American exceptionalism, drove the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy and its subsequent incorporation into the United States. The essay’s structure is chronological, beginning with the establishment of the Hawaiian Kingdom and progressing through the influence of missionaries, the economic dominance of sugar, the key Reciprocity Treaty, the overthrow of Queen Liliuokalani, and finally, the annexation under President McKinley. Specific evidence is provided through mentions of King Kamehameha I, the 1875 Reciprocity Treaty, Pearl Harbor, Queen Liliuokalani, John L. Stevens, Sanford B. Dole, and the Newlands Resolution. The tone is critical and analytical, highlighting the exploitative nature of the annexation and its negative impact on Hawaiian identity.

Key Considerations

While the essay provides a solid overview, a deeper exploration of the internal divisions within Hawaiian society or the specific arguments used by annexationists might strengthen it. For example, the essay could benefit from detailing the specific ways the Hawaiian language and culture were suppressed post-annexation, offering more granular examples of this cultural impact. Alternatively, a section could address the perspectives of the native Hawaiians more directly, perhaps through the inclusion of oral histories or petitions against annexation, to provide a more multifaceted portrayal of the resistance. Examining the economic benefits that accrued specifically to the U.S. government and its citizens beyond just the sugar planters might also add another layer of analysis.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, ensure your thesis is as clear and direct as this example's. Use specific historical events, figures, and treaties to support your claims; avoid vague statements. Maintain a consistent, analytical tone that clearly conveys your argument. Focus on cause and effect, showing how one event led to another. Do not simply list facts; explain their significance in relation to your thesis. Ensure your conclusion summarizes your main points and offers a final thought on the topic, similar to how this essay connects the past to the present.

Frequently Asked Questions

Key players included American missionaries and their descendants, American and European businessmen focused on the sugar industry, U.S. government officials like Minister John L. Stevens and President William McKinley, and the Hawaiian monarchy and its supporters.

The lucrative sugar trade created economic dependency and gave American planters significant political and economic leverage, driving their desire for formal U.S. control to secure market access and profits.

No, the annexation was largely opposed by native Hawaiians, who sought to maintain their sovereignty. Queen Liliuokalani's efforts to restore power to native Hawaiians were a direct catalyst for the overthrow.

The Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 granted the U.S. access to Pearl Harbor. This strategic naval base became a critical asset for the U.S. military, particularly during the Spanish-American War, reinforcing the rationale for annexation.