Literature & Books Review essay 683 words

Frankenstein Book Review

Sample Essay

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus, published anonymously in 1818, transcends its gothic horror origins to offer a profound and enduring examination of ambition, creation, and the very essence of humanity. More than two centuries later, the novel’s chilling narrative of Victor Frankenstein’s hubristic pursuit of life and the subsequent suffering of his creation continues to provoke deep thought about the ethical boundaries of scientific endeavor and the societal forces that shape identity. Shelley masterfully crafts a story that questions not only the creator’s responsibility but also the definition of monstrosity itself, arguing implicitly that cruelty and neglect can forge the very monsters we fear.

At the heart of Frankenstein lies Victor’s insatiable ambition, a driving force that blinds him to the potential consequences of his actions. Fueled by a desire to conquer death and achieve god-like status, Victor labours tirelessly in his Ingolstadt laboratory. His single-minded focus, however, leads to utter neglect of his personal life and his eventual creation. The moment of animation, rather than being a triumph, is a scene of profound horror for Victor. He recoils from the creature he has brought into existence, repulsed by its appearance and abandoning it to a world that will inevitably judge it solely on its physical form. This immediate rejection sets the stage for the creature’s tragic arc. Shelley uses Victor’s horrified reaction to highlight the superficiality of human judgment, where outward appearance dictates acceptance or ostracization. Victor’s ambition, therefore, is not merely scientific curiosity; it is a selfish pursuit that prioritizes personal glory over the well-being of his creation, making him the true architect of the ensuing tragedy.

The creature’s subsequent journey is a poignant exploration of nature versus nurture. Initially, the being is benevolent and intelligent, yearning for connection and understanding. He learns language by observing the De Lacey family, experiencing empathy and developing a profound appreciation for human society. He witnesses their kindness, their joys, and their sorrows, and for a time, he believes he might find acceptance. However, his monstrous appearance consistently thwarts these attempts. Whether the villagers or the De Laceys themselves, everyone reacts with fear and violence upon seeing him. This universal rejection transforms his initial desire for love into bitter resentment and a thirst for revenge. Shelley powerfully illustrates how societal prejudice and the absence of compassion can corrupt even a potentially good being. The creature’s lament, "I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend," encapsulates this transformation, shifting the narrative's focus from Victor's scientific sin to society's moral failing.

The novel’s structure, employing a frame narrative with Robert Walton’s letters to his sister, further amplifies the themes of isolation and the consequences of ambition. Walton, an explorer driven by a similar desire for discovery and glory, encounters Victor on the Arctic ice. Victor’s story serves as a cautionary tale, a warning against the dangers of unchecked ambition. His narrative is punctuated by his suffering, his loss, and his relentless pursuit of the creature, a pursuit that mirrors the destructive cycle of revenge. The framing device emphasizes the universality of Victor’s plight; Walton, initially eager to push his ship further north, is swayed by Victor’s narrative and ultimately turns back, his own ambition tempered by the older man’s tragic experience. This narrative layering allows Shelley to explore the dangers of extreme ambition from multiple perspectives, solidifying the novel’s enduring relevance.

Ultimately, Frankenstein is not just a story about a monster and his creator; it is a profound commentary on the responsibilities inherent in creation, the destructive power of prejudice, and the fundamental human need for belonging. Victor Frankenstein’s failure lies not only in his act of creation but in his utter abdication of parental and societal responsibility. The creature, in his desperate search for acceptance and his subsequent acts of violence, becomes a mirror reflecting the failings of his creator and the society that condemned him. Shelley’s masterpiece continues to resonate because it forces us to confront uncomfortable questions about our own capacity for both creation and destruction, and the lasting impact of our choices on those we bring into the world.

Analysis

This review essay effectively argues that Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is a timeless exploration of ambition, creation, and humanity, transcending its genre to offer profound ethical and social commentary. The thesis is clearly established in the introduction and is consistently supported throughout the body paragraphs. The essay is well-structured, moving logically from Victor's ambition to the creature's development and the novel's narrative framing. Specific examples, such as Victor's abandonment of the creature, the creature's observation of the De Lacey family, and Robert Walton's encounter with Victor, provide concrete evidence for the claims made. The tone is analytical and insightful, maintaining a serious and academic register appropriate for a literary review.

Key Considerations

While the essay capably analyzes the core themes, it could benefit from a more direct engagement with Shelley's specific literary techniques beyond narrative structure. For instance, a deeper dive into her use of pathetic fallacy or the sublime in nature could strengthen the analysis of the creature's emotional state. Additionally, exploring critical interpretations of Frankenstein from its publication to contemporary readings might offer a richer understanding of its evolving significance. A more nuanced discussion of Victor's motivations, perhaps touching on the scientific context of the early 19th century, could also add depth.

Recommendations

For students adapting this model, focus on grounding your arguments in specific textual evidence. Instead of stating Victor's ambition, quote a passage that illustrates it. When discussing the creature's learning, refer to a scene where he observes the De Laceys. Ensure your thesis is specific and arguable, not just a summary. Avoid vague pronouncements; instead, ask "how" and "why" Shelley presents certain ideas. Maintain a consistent, academic tone. Don't just describe the plot; analyze its thematic implications. Remember to connect your points back to your central argument.

Frequently Asked Questions

The main themes revolve around the dangers of unchecked scientific ambition, the ethical responsibilities of creators, the corrupting influence of societal rejection, and the complex nature of humanity and monstrosity.

The primary characters are Victor Frankenstein, a young scientist, and his unnamed creation, often referred to as the "monster" or "fiend," and Robert Walton, the explorer who narrates much of the story.

The subtitle refers to the Greek myth of Prometheus, who stole fire from the gods for humanity and was punished. Victor Frankenstein plays a similar role by "stealing" life from nature, facing severe consequences for his transgression.

Mary Shelley's novel *Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus* was first published anonymously in 1818, during the Romantic era.