Literature & Books 786 words

Achilles a Hero Myth in the Iliad by Homer

Sample Essay

Homer's Iliad presents Achilles not merely as a formidable warrior, but as a figure wrestling with the very definition of heroism. His prowess on the battlefield is undeniable, his kleos (glory) sought above all else. Yet, this pursuit of immortal fame is inextricably bound to his potent menis (wrath), a consuming emotion that dictates much of his action and ultimately leads to profound tragedy. Examining Achilles' motivations, his relationship with honor, and the fatal consequences of his pride reveals a hero far more complex and human than a simple paragon of virtue.

Achilles' heroism is fundamentally defined by his insatiable desire for kleos. He understands that his life will be short, as prophesied by his mother Thetis, but he chooses a life of glorious renown over a long, obscure existence. This choice is evident from the outset, when Agamemnon's insult – the seizure of Briseis – ignites Achilles' fury. He withdraws from battle, not out of cowardice, but because his honor has been affronted. His pride, a cornerstone of his heroic identity, demands retribution. He states, "And now I will go to the ships, to my dear father Peleus, and tell him all that has happened to me, and know well the future doom that awaits me, if I stay here and die" (Homer, trans. Lattimore, Book 9). This declaration highlights his awareness of his fate and his conscious decision to prioritize immortal fame over personal safety or comfort. His willingness to risk death for glory, even when the cause is personal affront rather than the greater good of the Achaeans, is a defining characteristic of his heroic—albeit self-centered—nature.

The central driving force behind Achilles' actions in the Iliad is his wrath. Agamemnon's theft of Briseis is perceived as a profound dishonor, an emasculation that wounds Achilles' pride more deeply than any physical blow. This anger festers, leading him to withdraw from combat and pray for Achaean defeat so that Agamemnon will regret his transgression. His impassioned speeches to Odysseus, Phoenix, and Ajax in Book 9, detailing his grievances, reveal the depth of his wounded ego. He refuses their lavish gifts and pleas, demonstrating that his anger is not easily appeased. This rage, while motivating his return to battle after the death of Patroclus, also blinds him to reason and empathy. His subsequent rampage, while awe-inspiring, is also brutal and indiscriminate, culminating in the desecration of Hector's corpse. This act, an extreme manifestation of his grief and fury, pushes the boundaries of acceptable heroic conduct, even within the brutal context of the Trojan War.

The tragic arc of Achilles is inextricably linked to his fatal flaws: his pride and his inability to control his rage. His withdrawal from battle, driven by wounded honor, costs the Achaeans dearly, leading to the deaths of many comrades, most notably Patroclus. The death of his beloved friend is the catalyst that finally unleashes Achilles' full destructive potential. His grief is overwhelming, transforming his earlier rage into a vengeful fury that consumes him. His lament for Patroclus is intensely personal and moving: "Ah, woe is me! That I ever was born to be a ruin to my dearest companions" (Book 18). This moment of vulnerability underscores the emotional cost of his pride and his isolation. However, his subsequent pursuit of Hector, his brutal slaying of the Trojan prince, and his barbaric dragging of the body around the walls of Troy demonstrate a loss of control that borders on savagery. While his return to the fight is heroic in its ferocity, his treatment of Hector's body reveals a hero consumed by his passions, far from the ideal of a just or merciful warrior.

Ultimately, Achilles’ encounter with Priam in Book 24 offers a glimpse of a more nuanced heroism, one tempered by shared humanity and the recognition of mortal suffering. Priam’s plea for Hector’s body is moving, appealing directly to Achilles’ own sense of loss and his father, Peleus. In this poignant scene, Achilles weeps for Hector, for Patroclus, and for his own mortality. He recognizes the shared plight of humanity, the pain of loss that transcends the battlefield. "And Achilles, with a sigh, drew back his hands, for he was filled with pity for the old man" (Book 24). This act of empathy, this moment of profound understanding, suggests a potential for growth and a deeper form of heroism beyond mere martial glory. However, this profound moment is fleeting, and Achilles’ ultimate fate—his death at the Scaean Gates—reinforces the tragic nature of a life defined by the pursuit of glory and consumed by powerful emotions. His story serves as a timeless exploration of the complex interplay between honor, rage, and the enduring human capacity for both great violence and profound compassion.

Analysis

The essay establishes a clear thesis in its introduction, asserting that Achilles is a complex hero defined by his pursuit of kleos and his consuming wrath. The body paragraphs effectively develop this thesis by exploring specific aspects of Achilles' character. The first body paragraph focuses on his motivation for glory, citing his awareness of his short life and his pride. The second delves into his wrath, using the seizure of Briseis as the primary example and referencing his refusal of Agamemnon's offers. The third paragraph analyzes his fatal flaws, linking his pride and rage to the tragic consequences, particularly the death of Patroclus and his brutalization of Hector's corpse. The essay concludes by highlighting the profound encounter with Priam as a moment of shared humanity, while still acknowledging the tragic dimension of Achilles' life. The tone is academic and analytical, supported by specific references to events and themes within The Iliad.

Key Considerations

While the essay effectively analyzes Achilles' wrath and pride, it could benefit from a more direct engagement with the concept of divine intervention and its role in shaping Achilles' destiny and actions. For instance, the role of Thetis in manipulating events or Zeus's agreement to have the Trojans gain the upper hand could be further explored as external forces impacting Achilles' choices. Additionally, a more sustained comparison with other heroic figures, either within the Iliad or in later literature, could offer a richer context for understanding Achilles' unique brand of heroism and its limitations. The essay might also consider the Achaean perspective more thoroughly, examining how Achilles' actions were perceived by his own people beyond just Agamemnon's immediate rivals.

Recommendations

Ensure your thesis is as specific as this one, clearly stating the main arguments you will explore. Use concrete examples from the text, like the specific insults or events, to support each point. Don't just summarize; analyze why these events are significant to your argument. Maintain a consistent, formal tone throughout, avoiding casual language. When discussing themes like kleos or menis, define them briefly if they are specialized terms. Conclude by not just restating your thesis but by offering a final thought or broader implication of your analysis. Avoid fabricating specific page numbers or citations if you are not quoting directly.

Frequently Asked Questions

*Kleos* refers to glory, fame, or renown, particularly that which is achieved through great deeds, often in battle. It was a primary motivation for many Achaean heroes.

Achilles' wrath leads him to withdraw from battle, causing significant losses for the Achaeans. His anger ultimately results in the death of his dearest friend, Patroclus, prompting his return and further bloodshed.

Achilles embodies heroic ideals of courage and loyalty, but his pride, rage, and vengeful actions make him a morally complex figure, not a simple role model.

The meeting with Priam shows Achilles' capacity for empathy and shared human suffering, revealing a deeper dimension to his character beyond his warrior persona.