General 772 words

Call Me by Your Name 2017 and Maurice 1989

Sample Essay

Luca Guadagnino's Call Me by Your Name (2017) and James Ivory's Maurice (1987) stand as significant cinematic explorations of burgeoning queer desire, each set in a specific historical moment and offering a unique lens on the experience of same-sex attraction. While separated by nearly three decades, both films grapple with themes of intense first love, the internal conflict between societal expectations and personal longing, and the gradual, often hesitant, steps towards self-acceptance. Examining these films side-by-side reveals not only the enduring nature of these struggles but also how historical context shapes their articulation and resolution. Call Me by Your Name captures the sun-drenched, introspective awakening of Elio in 1980s Italy, contrasting with Maurice's depiction of Maurice Hall's more constrained and socially perilous journey in Edwardian England. Ultimately, both films, despite their different settings and narrative approaches, powerfully illustrate the universal human need for connection and the profound impact of embracing one's true desires.

Maurice, based on E.M. Forster's novel, is inherently a film of its time, reflecting the deeply ingrained homophobia and social stratification of early 20th-century Britain. Maurice Hall's awakening to his attraction to Clive Durham, a fellow Cambridge student, is marked by secrecy and profound internal turmoil. The film meticulously portrays the risks involved; mere suspicion could lead to social ruin, professional ruin, and intense personal shame. Clive, representing a more socially conscious but ultimately fearful individual, advises Maurice to suppress his desires, to "smile and be a man." This advice underscores the societal pressure to conform to heteronormative expectations. The narrative arc for Maurice is one of slow, painful realization and eventual rebellion against this imposed silence. His relationship with Clive, though significant, is ultimately unfulfilled due to Clive’s decision to marry a woman, leaving Maurice adrift and disillusioned. However, the film's climax, where Maurice finds genuine connection and acceptance with the gamekeeper Alec Scudder, offers a hopeful, albeit still somewhat circumspect, resolution. The ending, which suggests a future together, is revolutionary for its time, portraying a private defiance of societal norms.

In contrast, Call Me by Your Name unfolds in 1983, a period where while still not fully accepted, the landscape for expressing queer identity was beginning to shift, at least in certain liberal circles. Elio's experience is one of intense, almost overwhelming, sensory and emotional discovery. His attraction to Oliver, an older American graduate student visiting his family’s villa, is portrayed with a remarkable lack of shame or external censure from his immediate surroundings, particularly his parents. The film emphasizes the intellectual and emotional resonance between Elio and Oliver, framing their connection as a beautiful, natural unfolding. While the threat of social disapproval is implicitly present, it doesn't manifest as a direct, paralyzing force within the narrative's primary sphere. Instead, Elio's internal struggle is more about navigating the intensity of his feelings, the vulnerability of first love, and the inevitable pain of its transience. The film’s most poignant moments revolve around the quiet intensity of their interactions, the shared glances, the hesitant touches, and the profound conversations that forge their bond.

The differing societal contexts dramatically influence how the characters confront and express their desires. In Maurice, the danger is palpable. The scene where Maurice is accosted by a detective for suspected homosexual activity vividly illustrates the legal and social peril. His confession to Clive is fraught with anxiety, and Clive’s subsequent withdrawal highlights the pervasive fear of exposure. The film’s visual language often reflects this constraint, with characters often depicted in formal attire, within the confines of stifling drawing rooms or hushed academic halls. Call Me by Your Name, however, revels in the openness of summer in northern Italy. The characters are often scantily clad, surrounded by nature, and the dialogue, while intelligent and nuanced, flows more freely. Elio’s father’s profound, non-judgmental conversation with Elio after his relationship with Oliver ends is a striking contrast to the fear and repression depicted in Maurice. This scene, in particular, signifies a generational and societal shift, where parental acceptance and emotional support become central to the process of self-discovery.

Despite these differences, both films powerfully convey the universal experience of falling in love and the courage it takes to acknowledge and pursue that love. Maurice's journey from repression to defiant self-acceptance, and Elio's journey from hesitant awakening to profound, albeit bittersweet, emotional maturity, are deeply resonant. Both films celebrate the transformative power of genuine connection and the deep human need to be seen and loved for who one truly is. They remind us that while the external forces of societal judgment and historical circumstance may change, the internal landscape of desire and the quest for authentic selfhood remain constant.

Analysis

The essay's thesis, "Examining these films side-by-side reveals not only the enduring nature of these struggles but also how historical context shapes their articulation and resolution," is clear and directly addresses the comparative nature of the prompt. The structure is logical, introducing both films and their general themes, then dedicating body paragraphs to distinct aspects of comparison: the historical context of Maurice, the context of Call Me by Your Name, the differing societal impacts on character actions, and finally, a synthesis of their shared thematic resonance. The use of evidence is strong, referencing specific plot points and character interactions like Clive's advice to Maurice, the detective scene, and Elio's father's conversation. The tone is appropriately academic and analytical, maintaining a serious yet appreciative perspective on the films.

Key Considerations

While the essay effectively highlights historical context, a deeper dive into the cinematic techniques used by each director to represent that context could strengthen the analysis. For example, how does Ivory's framing or shot composition in Maurice convey constraint compared to Guadagnino's use of natural light and movement in Call Me by Your Name? Additionally, the essay could explore the differing portrayals of masculinity and societal roles for men in each era more explicitly, beyond just the repression of desire. A discussion of how race or class, while less central, might subtly influence the characters' experiences could offer further nuance.

Recommendations

When adapting this essay, focus on weaving your comparative points throughout the body paragraphs rather than dedicating entire sections to each film. Try to use more comparative language like "whereas," "similarly," "in contrast," and "both." Ensure your evidence directly supports your comparative claims. Avoid simply summarizing plot points; instead, explain how those plot points demonstrate a difference or similarity in historical context or thematic treatment. For instance, instead of just saying Elio's father talked to him, explain why that conversation is significant in contrast to Maurice's era.

Frequently Asked Questions

The essay argues that comparing *Call Me by Your Name* and *Maurice* reveals how historical context influences the portrayal and resolution of queer desire, while also highlighting universal themes of love and self-acceptance.

*Maurice* is set in Edwardian England, a period of intense homophobia and social repression, while *Call Me by Your Name* is set in 1983 Italy, where societal attitudes were beginning to shift, allowing for more open expression of desire.

Both films explore themes of first love, the internal conflict between personal desire and societal expectations, and the journey towards self-acceptance and authentic connection.

The essay points to Maurice being accosted by a detective for suspected homosexual activity, illustrating the legal and social peril faced by gay men in that era.